Do you have a list of things that have been corroborated? Because I'm not aware of anything that has been, and I've written about 30 posts on it.
By "everyone" you mean people who didn't pay attention to DiFi's confirmation that it's not the entire dossier, the payment amounts, or the numbering. So, people who don't know what they're talking about. Yes. Everyone.
-
-
Citation needed, preferably Congressional testimony.
-
Let's take a step back. The proper way to ask for a citation to something you're ignorant of, even while you argue in contradiction to it, is, "May I have a citation for that, please." I'm not your research assistant, and won't respond to dickish orders.
-
I feel no obligation to be polite to someone who refers to another’s work as a “shitshow.”
-
And thus far I've backed that reference with a bunch of extra links, to things you appeared ignorant of. And you ... still can't explain how a December report can predict October events. So do your own work or wallow in ignorance then, if you refuse to be marginally civil.
-
Your claim that Sipher used a December report to say it predicted October events is bizarre. He doesn’t do that, and your case that he did is pure assertion with none evidence. It’s barely even coherent.
-
Oh my. Really? If I show you where he does it, all slow like so you'll understand it, promise you'll go away and do your homework b4 you continue to litter my TL?
-
Sure. Despite the snark, I am paying attention.
-
I asked for a promise. You're giving that?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why are you hanging your defense of Sipher on this point anyway? He even asks whether it's the entire dossier, so he disagrees w/your certainty. Can you explain why he uses a Dec report to prove dossier predicted stuff that was publicly reported in October?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.