I keep coming back to the silence on the June 9 meeting bc it seems, w/o explaining that, you can't assess the dossier project as a whole. Plus, if either Agalarov or Akhemtshin learned the project, both could tell RU intel, which means it'd be poisoned from the get-go.
-
Unless you think the article's sources are lying. Which is remotely possible, but it's not something I am willing to assume without good reason.
-
-
"The committee cannot really decide the credibility of the dossier without understanding things like who paid for it, who are your source and sub-sources, though we have been incredibly... enlightened, in our ability to rebuild backwards the Steele Dossier up to a certain date"
-
"... getting past that point has been somewhat impossible. I say that because I don't think there's any intelligence *product* that is going to unlock that key to pre-of-June '16."
-
Thats' a quote from Richard Burr, in early October 2017. Did you already know about this? He said "incredibly enlightened"? O_o
-
I did a post focusing on his quest for info on who got paid. Not on the enlightening word choice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.