Wikileaks didn't publish the data. It is attributed to Guccifer 2.0 (though that attribution has always been really curious). Wikileaks only published a link to it.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @ggreenwald
Why was that attribution curious? G2 dropped the files and WL asked me to put them into a torrent, which they then tweeted.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NatSecGeek @ggreenwald
Any idea why G2 never linked to them directly from the WP site?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
One reason I'm so interested is bc the file is at the core of the skeptics' rebuttals but they've never thought through how it got posted or why it wasn't posted to the WP site.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ggreenwald
"G2" used a variety of drop sites and a couple of fronts for variety. The WP site had previously had stuff removed because of content that was dropped there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NatSecGeek @ggreenwald
Yes. I'm aware of that. But there's no evidence that happened with this particular file/link.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @ggreenwald
It didn't, but it still provides a reason: a larger dump would be vulnerable at the WP site and could endanger the rest of the content, plus the publicity of dropping it there and the mystery surrounding it. Plus IIRC the content and provenance of it was questionable. /1
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So putting it on the WP site would have carried several risks with it, including tainting the rest of the contents there (some of which was modified). 2/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NatSecGeek @ggreenwald
Is this your speculation or was that explained to you, if you're willing to say?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ggreenwald
The conclusion? Informed speculation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Thanks. Better informed speculation than anyone else, though.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.