"Some have been verified." Name one. And yes, the cyber one has been publicly disproven. It's hackishly bad.
Show this thread
-
You seem extremely skeptical of Steele for someone who said this: "I have reasonable confidence in Steele’s findings." It's raw intelligence. Steele himself says up to 30% may not be valid.
-
-
And I'd love to see which 70% Steele thinks are real. Or even 20%.
-
In the big picture, anyone pushing the idea that the sort of crimes Mueller has thus far charged are his ultimate target is full of it. As is anyone pushing the notion that Trump's connection to Putin is benign, given all public info.
-
And ZERO of that has to do with the dossier. And the biggest crime that will get charged was not in dossier bc the dossier was known in real time, probably.
-
When there's so much real evidence of a Trump/Russia conspiracy, why would Steele, an actual spy w/ Russian connections, make stuff up? You're claiming he's either incompetent, lying for money, or a Russian agent. The USIC doesn't seem to share your opinion, regardless.
-
You're missing some options on what Steele might be. Maybe think a bit more about that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.