Here's something else it'd be fun to see: reporting on the provenance problems surrounding the dossier as released.
Show this thread
-
50 minutes in. Rachel has yet to point to something that has been proven true. But our 7th commercial break, I think.
Show this thread
"it began as a hunch." No. It began when they found they'd been hacking the Dems for almost a year.
-
-
Rachel here obfuscating. Listing a BUNCH of stuff that was not predicted in the dossier. NOT telling readers the dossier said he met with OTHER officials.
Show this thread -
Remember, Rinat Akhmetshin was doing work for Fusion at this time, may have been paid by Fusion. Not in the dossier. This is actually the BIGGEST discrediting data point. But ... she's no telling viewers that.
Show this thread -
NOOOOO. Russia was feeding other info. And until after the WL leak, Steele still said the dirt was old intercepted data.
Show this thread -
This is shoddy. Not A=A. This is what we accuse Trump followers of. WE KNEW THIS BEFORE THE FIRST DOSSIER REPORT
Show this thread -
"we now know" a federal GJ indicted him for entirely different shit!! God this is shoddy.
Show this thread -
"Then another person mentioned in the Steele dossier" plead guilty ... for something else. Christopher Steele had NONE of this story, Rachel!!
Show this thread -
"Americans need the truth." Sadly they won't get it at TRMS.
Show this thread -
Ending by re-upping: Cognitive Rot and the Steele Dossier https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/12/07/cognitive-rot-and-the-steele-dossier/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.