Another report -- the most dubious one!! -- ignored thus far in TRMS entire hour story on this.
-
Show this thread
-
It'd be REALLY awesome for Rachel to report on who gave Buzzfeed this dossier bc Steele has NOT listed them as an official recipient.
3 replies 8 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
Note how Rachel is NOT comparing the dossier w/known contemporaneous events? There's a reason for that.
1 reply 4 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Here's something it'd be fun to see a partisan outlet to cover: How Manafort worked w/WH to respond to this.
1 reply 3 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Here's something else it'd be fun to see: reporting on the provenance problems surrounding the dossier as released.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
Again, this dood is not reviewing the dossier as compared to known events.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
All Rachel's British sources look like they've lived on Martinis since 1992.
8 replies 3 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
"It would be up to investigators to sort it out." Aren't YOU, Rachel Maddow, an investigator?
3 replies 1 retweet 20 likesShow this thread -
Apparently if you cover the dossier credulously you can access unlimited amount of commercial support. I realize I'm doing it wrong.
3 replies 7 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emptywheel
if only you hadn't said "blowjob" on TV, think of where you'd be today! :p
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If I hadn't done that I'd have called Spitzer "Client 9" on air, which I only narrowly avoided.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.