Yesterday when I was in Twitter jail I did more oversight than any of these HPSCI goofballs: "Hype:" How FBI Decided Searching 702 Content Was the Least Intrusive Means https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/11/30/hype-how-fbi-decided-searching-702-content-was-the-least-intrusive-means/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Two things I strongly disagree with
@AshaRangappa_'s good faith defense of 702 back doors: 1) It is not true that FBI "routinely audits" FBI's back door searches. Just 27% of field offices even got 702 visits in last released Seminannual report, & visits do a sample1 reply 6 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
2) FBI requires Agents to consider "least intrusive" investigative methods, and considers wiretaps to be very intrusive, says more intrusive methods might do more harm than good. So why do back door searches for assessments?
1 reply 3 retweets 15 likesShow this thread
Here's how FBI BOTH says that wiretaps are very intrusive but then says whatev, access them for assessments.pic.twitter.com/JjH2EXQqg0
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.