ICYMI: I've updated my table of claims in the Steele dossier with evidence for or against.https://nucleardiner.wordpress.com/2017/11/26/steele-dossier-claims-updated/ …
-
Oh wow. Yes I am an EVIL PERSON who is not instantly agreeing with you. I didn't follow that part closely. You did. Seems to me it makes more sense to work together than to yell at each other, but obviously YMMV.
Cheryl, where did I say you were evil? I didn't. I said that the project would be better served if it noted things that were definitively wrong in real time, much less now.
-
-
As I've noted, to extent dossier might bear out it's on the trips to RU, not on hack&leak. But that itself raises real questions, Qs that might be answered by Steele's forté ($, not digits) or by disinfo.
-
What I have done is collected evidence and set it against the dossier's claims. I have made my work public so that others can use it. I do not claim that it is exhaustive or definitive.
-
I have been impressed at the degree to which you and I agree, although I haven't said much about it. I will probably evaluate some of the areas that I have been following more closely. I hope you continue on your areas of interest.
-
I wasn't sure I had "areas of interest," as I've assessed the dossier from a slew of angles (including obvious contradictions in Steele/Fusion's stories). I'd love to hear what approach I'm missing, actually, cause I'm happy to address them.
-
I guess this is why I haven't said much about agreeing with you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.