no, i have no reason so far to assume "bad faith" per se. i do have reason to suspect lack of due diligence bordering on malpractice, though.
-
-
Replying to @empiricalerror @ifthedevilisix
Kind of hard to exercise great due diligence from London.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
If his practices were thought to lack due diligence, his memos wouldn't be taken so seriously and used to help conduct the investigation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
and that's where you're wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
A lot of it lines up with what is now known, & Mueller interviewed Steele:http://www.businessinsider.com/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-russia-timeline-2017-10 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You keep posting that article, in spite of the fact that we've repeatedly told you it's a shit show. You need to work from the actual dossier, not shit show pieces.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @empiricalerror
Bertrand is notoriously bad on this stuff. Good reporter, though. (Bad analyst, imo)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
where are the errors in her report?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
much of what
@emptywheel laid out in the latter half of this piece https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/09/06/john-siphers-garbage-post-arguing-the-steele-dossier-isnt-garbage/ … also applies to the bertrand article.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
in short: - the timing is backwards. - claimed hits aren't actual hits. - circular references.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh. I just realized something. It was disinfo. It led the Dems to be complacent.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.