Thanks. Did you mean to reply to a different tweet, one which that sentiment was on point to?
Huh. We've got 4 different investigations into Putin's interference and a NYT article attacking a sports star for not being sufficiently critical of his President.
-
-
Sounds appropriate. We should have even more attention on the GOPs shameful vote suppression but that doesn't mean the attention on the Russia meddling is over the top.
-
So you're changing your position now and admitting that there is attention on RU meddling. OK. Thanks.
-
I said some pundits downplay it. I'll stand by that, as will your timeline.
-
The timeline that you misinterpreted to impose your own judgement that you've just revised? That timeline? I'm convinced; Putin's tampering is causing cognitive rot in America and we need to reverse that.
-
Good. Agreed.
-
Lol. Funny. It will eventually and obviously apply to everyone who downplays Russian involvement in the US election.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But look: I know vote suppression did more to elect Trump than Putin did. And I applaud efforts to being this up... but I despise attempts to play the two issues off one another, minimizing either.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.