I guess the good thing is that some people ask questions rather than just accepting inference
THREAD in which @MuckRock
has to explain it's not a RU influence op.
Because Schindler.https://twitter.com/resentfultweet/status/932277872122875905 …
-
-
-
Where's the inference in "sure seems like it"?
-
They asked 2 questions prior to that in the same tweet.
-
Again, where's the inference? Why pick on MuckRock, which does the opposite of steal documents and leak them, but instead uses the laws of the country to obtain documents and make them available.
-
What I said was at least the person whose tweet you reacted to asked questions rather than simply accepting what others were inferring. You are arguing about something else
-
No. No, I'm not. No one else was making accusations about MuckRock (Schindler was just making generalized rants). She just decided "it sure seems like" MuckRock was an influence op, BEFORE she asked the most basic questions about the site.
-
To make an inference would require first asking questions, maybe doing some more research, and THEN stating "sure seems like it."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
of course only a RU influence op would say that it isn't a RU influence op...pic.twitter.com/G0D8YTOoGW
-
That's true. But only provably so thanks to past FOIAs exposing JJA's CI logic. Which is how we know FOIAs must be a RU influence op.
-
john moss was a russian asset, clearly. there is no other explanation.
-
All the do-gooder governance types from that era were, absolutely.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is Schindler compiling a list?
@20committee#SchindlersList#p2#RussiaRussiaRussia#MuricaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.