Leahy-Lee versus USA Lip Service: An Improvement, But Still a Domestic-as-Foreign Surveillance Bill https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/11/17/leahy-lee-versus-usa-lip-service-an-improvement-but-still-a-domestic-as-foreign-surveillance-bill/ …
-
Show this thread
-
My summary: Unlike USA Lip Service (the HJC bill), the warrant requirement in Leahy-Lee is real.
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Also, unlike USA Lip Service, Leahy-Lee doesn't sunset the prohibition on about collection.
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Leahy-Lee MAY exempt the White House from report on unmasking request, which is stupid bc that's the entire point.
1 reply 3 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Leahy got
@LizaGoitein to erroneously claim Leahy-Lee will end warrantless access of USP comms (I suspect bc he knows it's not true).3 replies 2 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emptywheel
...not what can be collected up front. Obviously, NONE of the bills would stop incidental collection. 2/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Ah. This is not incidental collection. Incidental collection requires the involvement of a foreigner. Wyden's does stop the Tor collection. I can explain this but it would have been useful asking me before you publicly backed this bill.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.