My summary: Unlike USA Lip Service (the HJC bill), the warrant requirement in Leahy-Lee is real.
Show this thread
Leahy-Lee versus USA Lip Service: An Improvement, But Still a Domestic-as-Foreign Surveillance Bill https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/11/17/leahy-lee-versus-usa-lip-service-an-improvement-but-still-a-domestic-as-foreign-surveillance-bill/ …
-
-
-
Also, unlike USA Lip Service, Leahy-Lee doesn't sunset the prohibition on about collection.
Show this thread -
Leahy-Lee MAY exempt the White House from report on unmasking request, which is stupid bc that's the entire point.
Show this thread -
Leahy got
@LizaGoitein to erroneously claim Leahy-Lee will end warrantless access of USP comms (I suspect bc he knows it's not true).Show this thread -
One other way USA Lip Service is better than Leahy-Lee is use limitations tied to 702 certs. Given that Leahy-Lee still permits collex of domestic comms (off Tor), this is a big deal.
Show this thread -
.
@ACLU has perhaps the most bizarre strategy in civil liberties creation: 1) supporting BOTH Leahy-Lee and Wyden-Paul 2) supporting a bill they ADMIT has constitutional problems 3) lobbying for something they're litigating againstShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.