Maybe the ones who believe the dossier has proven true -- that is, most of them? Maybe the ones who forget all evidentiary standards?
-
Do you accept Steele was experienced and expert in the area and his field?
Why is it that people say, "well, yeah, I can't show anything it predicted but he must be a genius"?
-
-
Why can't you intentionally misphrase what people say and believe and then not get the answer you want?
-
1) You couldn't show anything it predicted. 2) Having failed to do that, you pointed to his reported expertise, as if that replaces actual facts. But congratulations. You've proven, YET AGAIN, you have nothing.
-
1) You are wrong B) You are not denying it
-
I get that after admitting it got Page wrong you want credit anyway. But no, in fact, proving that it got Page wrong is proof it got Page wrong.
-
Seems like
#Steele had some good info prior to public disclosure Was he getting played? Maybe, but seems too soon to tell for surehttps://www.justsecurity.org/44697/steele-dossier-knowing/ … -
That's a crap post, sorry. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/09/06/john-siphers-garbage-post-arguing-the-steele-dossier-isnt-garbage/ … Breaks a number of key rules of analysis.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.