[Gets up, sees @ggreenwald & all his haters are engaged in a massive fight tagging me, where everyone is using 280. Crawls back to bed.]
-
Page meets a deputy of said Russian and not the guy himself. Grasp at straws?
-
-
You jUST admitted it got page wrong but you want credit close enough.
-
Do you accept Steele was experienced and expert in the area and his field?
-
Why is it that people say, "well, yeah, I can't show anything it predicted but he must be a genius"?
-
Why can't you intentionally misphrase what people say and believe and then not get the answer you want?
-
1) You couldn't show anything it predicted. 2) Having failed to do that, you pointed to his reported expertise, as if that replaces actual facts. But congratulations. You've proven, YET AGAIN, you have nothing.
-
1) You are wrong B) You are not denying it
-
I get that after admitting it got Page wrong you want credit anyway. But no, in fact, proving that it got Page wrong is proof it got Page wrong.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.