[Gets up, sees @ggreenwald & all his haters are engaged in a massive fight tagging me, where everyone is using 280. Crawls back to bed.]
No. I meant something that wasn't public. You're describing an expensive book report. Not to mention Steele got the page Russians wrong. Try again?
-
-
Oy to put it another way. You get a D.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Page meets a deputy of said Russian and not the guy himself. Grasp at straws?
-
Um no
-
Tweet unavailable
-
You jUST admitted it got page wrong but you want credit close enough.
-
Do you accept Steele was experienced and expert in the area and his field?
-
Why is it that people say, "well, yeah, I can't show anything it predicted but he must be a genius"?
-
Why can't you intentionally misphrase what people say and believe and then not get the answer you want?
-
1) You couldn't show anything it predicted. 2) Having failed to do that, you pointed to his reported expertise, as if that replaces actual facts. But congratulations. You've proven, YET AGAIN, you have nothing.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
lol moving the goalposts. I have a feeling when the pee tape gets released you’ll find a reason to say it doesn’t count either
-
He attached the goalposts to wheels. Meanwhile Glenn "lie to the FBI" is just misguided apparently
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.