[Gets up, sees @ggreenwald & all his haters are engaged in a massive fight tagging me, where everyone is using 280. Crawls back to bed.]
-
Why do you think it matters what you do or do not declare a "source"? This isn't just the Steele dossier per se but Page's testimony.
No. It is about whether the Page testimony MATCHES the Steele dossier. It doesn't. On the most important issues (WHO he met w/in RU, whether he got Rosneft deal), it conflicts with it.
-
-
I read the Page testimony. It does, you just don't "think" it matters he was in russia met some poobahs and discussed things that happened to be in the dossier.
-
Again, WHAT matches the dossier? Have you even read the dossier?
-
Yes I read it. Also, are you moving the goalposts when you mention if Page "got the deal or not".
-
No. I'm asking that the allegations in the dossier match what we know to have happened. You are treating suggesting non-like things can be treated as like. Again, what you accuse Glenn of doing.
-
Just to be clear. Page goes to Russia, meets with Poobahs and talks turkey with them. You dont think it matters because A) the deal may not have been sealed B) one source wrote about the dossier that you didnt like. Circular reasoning.
-
LOL. Goodbye. It's clear you are precisely the problem you're complaining about.
-
Have fun with your false equivalency workshop.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.