This is literally the first result on Google for "TPP consequences".https://www.thecipherbrief.com/strategic-consequences-of-u-s-withdrawal-from-tpp …
Has anyone actually done analysis about how the US-less TPP will hurt the US, or are every single one of the claims it will just knee-jerk?
-
-
-
And it literally doesn't answer my question.
-
It literally does. "Has anybody done an analysis?" "Here's one". "Has anybody done an analysis that confirms my bias?"
-
You DO KNOW that a new Pacific Rim was just laid out, right? Or is understanding current events against your bias? So perhaps one that examines that agreement and does the analysis would be useful.
-
You do know that you specifically asked about a US-less TPP, right? The analysis was based on the opinions of foreign ministers of signees of the TPP. If you want an analysis of a new agreement, don't call it the TPP and then blame me for talking about the TPP, ok?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think its knee jerk or data driven. More logical or game theory type analysis. Not being in it likely means barriers for US trade and less say in terms and less trade overall.
-
Michael, learn difference between "it's" and "its." Did your "logical or game theory type analysis" miss that the ISDS undermines U.S. sovereignty, or didn't you know about it?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/kill-the-dispute-settlement-language-in-the-trans-pacific-partnership/2015/02/25/ec7705a2-bd1e-11e4-b274-e5209a3bc9a9_story.html?utm_term=.6be7cf912041 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If only there were other examples of region wide trade/economic agreements & how the U.S. might negotiate trade into those regions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.