Yes. The dossier was the first mention of widespread Russian meddling in the election. That has been proven true. Steele couldn’t have known about that through public sources prior to June of 2016. Russia’s efforts to undermine NATO in this manner was not publicly known.
You're contesting that June 2015 is before June 2016? I've decided you must be a Russian bot bc no human could be this stupid.
-
-
You’re trying to argue that because there was a NYT piece from 2015 about hacking, that’s the same as widespread reporting/public knowledge of Russian interference in the election. This is obviously ridiculous. When were you first aware of the NYT piece?
-
all prior to any steele memo. need more?
-
oh, here. this one from july 4 2016 is a doozy:http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/07/vladimir_putin_has_a_plan_for_destroying_the_west_and_it_looks_a_lot_like.html …
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, that’s another strawman fallacy. See, you keep constructing strawmen because it’s easy to directly attack arguments you prefer rather than arguments that were actually made.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.