I’m not saying that at all and that is an obvious strawman. Obviously, any intelligence agent or journalist should be held to incredibly high standards. My point is merely that I see little to no evidence refuting anything substantial in the dossier.
-
I’m on a plane flying over the Midwest. The WiFi isn’t the best, but yes, I found it. This is specifically about the DNC hack and not about greater efforts to undermine the general election through, for example social media. This correlation does not substatiste your claim.
Remember how we've already established that there was a really good NYT article, more accurate than anything in dossier, in June 2015, which is a year before June 2016, in case you find that math hard?
-
-
You're contesting that June 2015 is before June 2016? I've decided you must be a Russian bot bc no human could be this stupid.
-
You’re trying to argue that because there was a NYT piece from 2015 about hacking, that’s the same as widespread reporting/public knowledge of Russian interference in the election. This is obviously ridiculous. When were you first aware of the NYT piece?
- 14 more replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.