I'm asking you for a single one from that article. Again, what it shows is that the CENTRAL ALLEGATIONS against Page are, if he is to be believed, FALSE. Which is the opposite of truth, in case you're catching up.
-
The other one, btw, is what FBI expected DNC to find when they told them, around the time report came out and was widely reported, to Google "the Dukes."
But you realize you're now saying, "Golly, that crack MI6 agent shouldn't be expected to do as thorough a job as using The Google or asking actual cybersecurity experts"?
-
-
I’m not saying that at all and that is an obvious strawman. Obviously, any intelligence agent or journalist should be held to incredibly high standards. My point is merely that I see little to no evidence refuting anything substantial in the dossier.
-
Remember: You are trying to prove that SOMETHING, some one thing (things that weren't publicly reported, like Page's trip) has proven true.
-
Yes. The dossier was the first mention of widespread Russian meddling in the election. That has been proven true. Steele couldn’t have known about that through public sources prior to June of 2016. Russia’s efforts to undermine NATO in this manner was not publicly known.
-
YOU ARE BATSHIT CRAZY. Steele's first report was June 20. The WaPo had a very big story on June 14 that said RUSSIANS HACKED DNC. Which is why the Steele dossier is so stupid.
-
Said in all caps, undermining the point. Has Trump taught you nothing? People who type in all caps tend to immediately discredit themselves. Link this WaPo article.
-
No. As a little exercise in critical thinking let's see if you can find it yourself. Go ahead! I've told you the outlet, subject, date. Hint: Use Crowdstrike too.
-
All this tweet shows is that you don’t know what “critical thinking” means.
-
Two things you should learn: 1. Correlation is not causation 2. When you resort to ad hominem in a debate, you automatically lose
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And it’s fair to say that the burden of proof is on the accuser (Steele), but as the intelligence community takes it seriously, one wonders why the rest of us should not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.