I think a lot of this is that to *readers* the editorial / investigative / validation process is mostly invisiblehttps://twitter.com/normative/status/929070102481395713 …
-
Show this thread
-
And so it hard to explain they WaPo or NYT have a journalistic process that is meaningfully different to …http://garbage-that-supports-my-confirmation-bias.com
4 replies 18 retweets 83 likesShow this thread -
To give you an example: a half dozen stories I've seen in NYT or WaPo were open secrets among major outlets for months prior to reporting
2 replies 22 retweets 111 likesShow this thread -
The Steele Dossier floated around major outlets from about September last year. It didn't come out until Jan *because* validating it is hard.
5 replies 26 retweets 128 likesShow this thread -
But because readers can't see the difference between WaPo's "I have 3 sources" and DumpsterFireNews' "I have no sources but say I have 3", it's a real problem.
4 replies 43 retweets 161 likesShow this thread -
And sort of by definition, you don't see the stories that don't make it.
2 replies 14 retweets 74 likesShow this thread -
Another example: the Gulen kidnap story? Been going round at several major news orgs since AT LEAST August that I know of. It's now mid-November.
4 replies 27 retweets 111 likesShow this thread -
The time between is journos at WSJ and elsewhere needing to go from "wow thats a hell of an allegation" to "we have the sources and evidence to prove it"
3 replies 33 retweets 111 likesShow this thread -
Eventually society needs to find ways to let readers distinguish real journalism from some of the modern confirmation-bias factories. Because journalism is hard and expensive, and will die if users can't or don't distinguish them.
11 replies 104 retweets 271 likesShow this thread -
Or the alfabank DNS story. Half a dozen news outlets picked it up. All ran it to ground, eventually concluding nothing there. Salon ran it, but it wasn't a scoop. It was them not running it to ground.
10 replies 15 retweets 68 likesShow this thread
Fact check: Slate ran it. (I've run that one to ground several times.)http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.