Um, no. It's a factually accurate thing to say. You are batshit. That's the part you're getting confused.
-
Your logical fallacy is that because someone may be telling the truth about SOMEthing, it means that they are therefore telling the truth about everything. It’s not all or nothing.
Huh? I've asked you for one set of facts that actually matches public testimony. You pointed to a very bad article that said Not A = A. Which obviously is a logical shitshow. Or do you actually believe that Not A = A? Is that how you learned logic?
-
-
I mean, I'm sorry the reporting on the dossier is so uniformly bad. But you should have the wherewithal to notice when a journalist says "This Not A thing proves the A allegation in the dossier" even if they can't.
-
You’re trying to re-dictate the narrative to fit your desired conclusion which is labeling people “Alex Jones”. Meanwhile, you are willfully ignoring anything that conflicts with your narrative. Ironically, this makes you look like Alex Jones.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.