President Trump, of course, urged his fans to boycott Apple during the campaign because of the San Bernardino case. And he's generally gone out of his way to appeal to law enforcement, which desperately wants a solution here.
-
Show this thread
-
There's an international component too. Australia is considering banning unbreakable encryption. A U.K. law might effectively require that. And after terrorist attacks, Germany and France have pressed for guaranteed access to encrypted data too:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-attacks-france-germany/france-germany-press-for-access-to-encrypted-messages-after-attacks-idUSKCN10Y174 …
3 replies 15 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
Back to Rosenstein. There's a bit of irony in him becoming the government's new encryption champion. The last person in that role was former FBI Director James Comey. You may remember Rosenstein wrote a little memo about Comey.
2 replies 11 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
"Encryption is one of the issues I agree completely with Jim Comey on," Rosenstein told me. "I think he was right about the issue."
1 reply 5 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
Expect to hear more about encryption from Rosenstein. He told me that his engagement is “a conscious decision on my part … because I think it’s one of the most important law enforcement challenges we face.”
1 reply 3 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
There's a lot more in my Rosenstein story, including a nugget about interagency deliberations on encryption, analysis of his comments from civil liberties and law enforcement types, and his response to a few key criticisms. http://politico.pro/2yjUA93
3 replies 9 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @ericgeller
Great interview!! Curious I’d you asked the outcome in the 2013/14 cases? Plea deals or successful prosecution, so crypto was just a speed bump, or it stopped the investigations? The thing I want to know when the FBI says it has 7k devices is how many stopped the investigation?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Robyn_Greene @ericgeller
Last I checked (and FBI's numbers on this changed in a significant way), they weren't even tracking what crimes they were tied to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ericgeller
So it's an even more bullshit number than we originally thought. Curious how the # changed - I hadn't seen that (not surprised though).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Robyn_Greene @ericgeller
I was told by FBI that the first version of this number reflected ALL phones they couldn't access, including those that were destroyed. Next version of it changed to only those bc of encryption. https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/11/11/fbi-still-fluffing-encryption-numbers/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And keep in mind these labs started keeping these numbers not long after 2 IG reports showed their numbers were unreliable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.