Yes there is blowback *risk* in situations like Playpen, but by no means certain or even likely. Benefits to be had will often outweigh that risk, as in this case. https://twitter.com/josephfcox/status/928216696845930496 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BobbyChesney @riskybusiness
Plus, DOJ has comity procedures in place, including for notification of unwitting violations. Not an unprecedented issue or one without a solution.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Also we are totally cool with China and Russia doing same.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If you had common agreement on threshold conditions, nature of LE activity, and underlying offense, then probably yes.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm with you but we have none of those things ! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not none, especially as related to Playpen. We cooperate with Russia on similar ops through the Interpol/Europol Task Force.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @daveaitel and
I take your point on the potentially fraught path here. Just pushing back on assumption that this is per se impermissible action or that there aren't historical examples of navigating unknown sovereignty issues.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
It worries me, for example, that we try to delimit a "NIT" as a thing. Sort of as if we want to state a policy or norm line without real basis in fact.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What do you mean?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.