Observation: A year ago most Dems swore all massive leaks from unknown sourcing were bad. Care to reconsider in light of Paradise Papers?
-
-
Yes, understood. — But the potentially catastrophic consequences of the misuse of another’s private data should be pretty clear by now.
-
One person’s catastrophe is another’s victory. And I can smell the victory with this leak, which is a dangerous drug. I already want more.
-
what matters is preventing gazillionaires from making off with basically all the money. how is it dangerous to flush this out?
-
Why not just break into political opponents homes and businesses and ransack the drawers? Any psychiatric files? https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-worlds-most-famous-filing-cabinet-36568830/ …pic.twitter.com/crvt0VxYcK
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
-
1. Well, that's the issue, isn't it? The US government has been breaking into Americans' (and foreign allies') electronic communications, ransacking them for data. Then Obama complained about the leaks that he can't do 'open source' diplomacy. He expected everybody else to be
-
2. fair game for surveillance, just not the US government.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.