Observation: A year ago most Dems swore all massive leaks from unknown sourcing were bad. Care to reconsider in light of Paradise Papers?
Show this thread
-
-
I'm operating on faith that it's an organization originally founded in 1997 by Chuck Lewis as a project of the Center for Public Integrity which has won multiple awards for journalism in collaboration with media organizations such as
@nytimes,@washingtonpost,@cbc,@lemondefr… -
NYT and WaPo didn't collaborate on Snowden leaks? Awards weren't won by that coverage?
-
I'm not sure what your point is, here. You said you were unsure if there was a difference between ICIJ and
@theintercept. I had sought to explain the difference, which is quite substantive. -
No. The evidence you presented to show a difference in fact showed that they were the same in many respects. You don't understand that?
-
No, I do not understand the nature of the similarity that you see. I've scanned your post & reply history from this morning and I don't see a context that explains your comments. Furthermore the remark about the Snowden leaks is not self-explanatory to me.
-
You said ICIJ is legit bc it partners w/WaPo & NYT (actually not that much in previous iterations) and won awards. So has Snowden reporting
-
The ICIJ is distinct from
@theintercept and@ggreenwald in that it is a coalition a few hundred investigative reporters from dozens of organizations with a clear structure of governance and a proven track record stretching back 20 years. [1/2] -
It is possible that this does not really make them "different" in the sense that you mean, but on the other hand, you haven't done a very good job of articulating what that similarity, and I'm not sure that I've undertaken to refute it. I've just told you what I know. [2/2]
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.