Let me be clear: everyone should avail themselves of the best legal representation they can get.
Which for historically minded Dems should mean 
why did they pick Clovis to protect with the Toensing barrage?
-
-
-
And when Clovis ditches the PR & lying approach for real lawyer I'll support his decision 100%. Until then: why hire a lying huckster?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s a clever plan to induce you to say “blowjob” again.
-
Democracy Now yelled "don't swear" into my earpiece as I went on today.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe I’m being dense, but why would Clovis choose her, knowing she’s more PR than lawyer?
-
Assuming Clovis chose her...
-
True...is it because “they” know he’s in deep sh*t and perhaps ties it all closer to trump?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.