Manafort allegedly laundered $1M through the local antique rug store.pic.twitter.com/Lhu6Z8rfAG
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If you guessed the item Manafort spent BY FAR the least on would be household labor, collect your winnings.pic.twitter.com/ZjN3xC84Sx
Tony Podesta's cameo.
#BipartisanCorruptInfluencePeddlingpic.twitter.com/G4noSZ42LU
Wonder what percentage of AirBNB properties are similar money laundering vehicles?pic.twitter.com/jJxvFFnoHC
Hopefully this will cause significant heartburn for all the corrupt influence peddlers in DC.pic.twitter.com/COYD5kw2J5
This is also the basis for a false statements charge, just in case novel idea of enforcing foreign registry laws doesn't work.pic.twitter.com/O3MYXzsLJL
Damn you Bob Mueller, you're going to take those fancy suits right off Paul Manafort's back?!?! At least leave him his $1M in antique rugs!pic.twitter.com/pOK29CHeqx
In summary, the indictment goes pretty easy on poor Paul (except for the bit abt forfeiting the fancy suits and rugs). A good first hand.
2 takeaways: By including Tony Podesta in here, Mueller shields himself fr partisanship claims. Manafort can flip w/o hurting "credibility"
Proposal: It ought to be a federal crime to launder 50X as much money thru your antique rug shop as thru your household labor.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.