BOOOOM!!!! https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/us/politics/paul-manafort-indicted.html?_r=0 …pic.twitter.com/L8T1auOzkh
-
-
Some comments: Sourcing—"a person involved in the case"—suggests a Manafort lawyer or spokesman.pic.twitter.com/sMVELgmqDr
21 replies 199 retweets 524 likesShow this thread -
Charges "not immediately clear." There are actually two issues here which will clarify over the course of the day. One is the charges.pic.twitter.com/Xz6ig0UdEa
8 replies 134 retweets 388 likesShow this thread -
The other, in some ways more important question, is what are the facts alleged in the indictment and how, if at all, do they relate...
9 replies 72 retweets 356 likesShow this thread -
...to the matters of concern in L'Affaire Russe? These are the things to watch for as the indictment gets unsealed.
11 replies 94 retweets 555 likesShow this thread -
Also, a point of cosmically important principle: Manafort and Gates are innocent until proven guilty.
67 replies 207 retweets 1,085 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @benjaminwittes @emptywheel
Note: Federal prosecutors don't issue indictments unless they know their case is ironclad.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.