Adam Hogan claims it's "probably" not violation of CFAA to hack back. Then admits he's talking abt corporations, which never get prosecuted.
Show this thread
-
Rather than addressing "attribution is hard" Hogan talks abt intl law not requiring 100% certainty b4 retaliation.
Show this thread
Hogan uses example of speaking French in historic misattribution (while mispronouncing "Niger").
-
-
Can we create a Cyber Admiralty Court [so Crowdstrike can hack back]?
Show this thread -
Answers Hogan can't answer: Who deserves letter of Marque, who deserves to be target, what are rewards necessary to balance.
Show this thread -
Basically whole letter of marque thing is an effort to create a lucrative new business area that will set up private justice for big corps.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.