Jesus, I agree with you on that basic point, but the way you are presenting it makes it sound like you think Fleischer may be correct.
-
And more importantly Putin and his associates had ample motive to aid Trump and to harm Clinton. You know all this. So does Fleischer.
I notice you didn't answer, Such as? The question is not whether Putin wants to compromise someone. It's what someone does in exchange.
-
-
You're still using the same bogus approach to accusation that makes Dems (and you) vulnerable to Fleischer's attack.
-
Are you are saying that had these unnamed Democrats waited for more details before calling collusion then Fleischer types would be silent?
-
I'm saying RIGHT NOW you're qualifying yourself for Fleischer's attack bc you've divorced actions from your judgement of morality.
-
So is that a “no”? Fleischer isn’t just spouting off prematurely, he’s seeding disinformation AFTER the facts are in.
-
Except you're still doing what he can rightly attack Dems for. Try stopping first, and THEN complaining.
-
If every stupid thing this or that Democrat says suddenly means we can’t call out BS for fear of hypocrisy, we might as well pack it in.
-
Sure. But if YOU continue to exhibit the problem then maybe you should pack in your pique?
-
Doesn't mean we shouldn't hold ourselves to a higher standard bc the opposition won't. Then we're just no different then them.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.