Veselnitskaya was seeking exchange of RU intel sourced info for something else. So was Steele. Steele is only one we know who got his goal
-
Bad judgment vs. bad faith. Dems saw Trump had motive, prior relationships, pattern of behavior pointing to collusion. Fleischer sees what?
So did Dems. Collusion as defined by them was trading things of value for info from FSB. Bingo. Collusion.
-
-
You seem to be operating on "Dems are good people and Trump is bad so it's okay for Dems to give a legal firm things of value for FSB info"
-
No, I’m operating on Trump had motive, prior relationships, had a pattern of soliciting and *using* Russian aid including illegal measures.
-
Such as?
-
And more importantly Putin and his associates had ample motive to aid Trump and to harm Clinton. You know all this. So does Fleischer.
-
I notice you didn't answer, Such as? The question is not whether Putin wants to compromise someone. It's what someone does in exchange.
-
You're still using the same bogus approach to accusation that makes Dems (and you) vulnerable to Fleischer's attack.
-
Are you are saying that had these unnamed Democrats waited for more details before calling collusion then Fleischer types would be silent?
-
I'm saying RIGHT NOW you're qualifying yourself for Fleischer's attack bc you've divorced actions from your judgement of morality.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.