Observation: Fact that Perkins Coie formally paid for dossier makes the dossier's horrible coverage of hack-and-leak all the more terrible.
-
Are you saying it’s all false? And who’s “they” exactly? Kind of broad brush. As you mention there’s other evidence re: Micheal Cohen et al
No. I'm not saying it's all false. I'm assessing the evidence. Which is what "they" (which appears to include "you") are not doing.
-
-
Well if *some* or *most* of it is true what the hell is the difference?
-
"some" and "most" (which you don't have evidence for) are different things. ESPECIALLY when you ignore badly stupid stuff in the dossier.
-
1) Steele dossier raw intel paid for by oppo research (1st GOP, then Dem) 2) Despite possible Rus disinfo shows links between Trump-Russia
-
3) Trump repeatedly said no Rus connections despite Cohen & Sater 4) So either way Trump lying 5) Using this to attack Dem strategy odd
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.