Observation: Fact that Perkins Coie formally paid for dossier makes the dossier's horrible coverage of hack-and-leak all the more terrible.
-
I think the problem here is not many Trump opponents are ”clinging” to the Steele dossier. It’s just another piece of the puzzle.
LOL. Sure they are. They're claiming it's all true on faith, in spite of evidence ot the contrary.
-
-
Are you saying it’s all false? And who’s “they” exactly? Kind of broad brush. As you mention there’s other evidence re: Micheal Cohen et al
-
No. I'm not saying it's all false. I'm assessing the evidence. Which is what "they" (which appears to include "you") are not doing.
-
Well if *some* or *most* of it is true what the hell is the difference?
-
"some" and "most" (which you don't have evidence for) are different things. ESPECIALLY when you ignore badly stupid stuff in the dossier.
-
1) Steele dossier raw intel paid for by oppo research (1st GOP, then Dem) 2) Despite possible Rus disinfo shows links between Trump-Russia
-
3) Trump repeatedly said no Rus connections despite Cohen & Sater 4) So either way Trump lying 5) Using this to attack Dem strategy odd
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.