Err no. Was paid for originally by Rs.Tjen passed to Dems. We knew this when it first came out. Misleading headline which GOP already using.
-
-
-
Again, INVESTING in this line is dumb. The dossier is not worth protecting. Dems keep kicking own goal after own goal on this.
-
So let the media get all faux-outragey over Hillary and the
@DNC again, and hype and sensationalize news that was reported back in May?pic.twitter.com/FXc3zOyjDi
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is the issue with funding someone looking in to Trump? And did they actually use any of the stuff against him?
-
No deal. Which is why this is stupid as shit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If it’s true it doesn’t matter who paid for it. Period.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some are saying they don't mind a British guy being paid to find dirt. Russians are unacceptable. Provincialism is the enemy.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
wait i've been under a rock, really? people are talking about that again? like, are they not embarrassed?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel like Dems secretly relieved by Trump phenomenon. Means they can finally fall peacefully asleep on the job while focus is elsewhere.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When does someone ask McCain about his role in the dossier? How weird that he does TV shows and isn't asked. Did 60 Minutes ask him?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.