.@LizaGoitein identifies a loophole in Section 702’s front-end targeting procedures and proposes a solution:https://www.justsecurity.org/46239/closing-section-702s-front-door-search-loophole-critical-protection-americans/ …
-
Bub. I already explained, you have no idea what you're talking abt. Maybe read stuff besides Lawfare?
Also have you noticed that THE MOST IMPORTANT documents aren't public? Or is that too subtle for you bc Lawfare didn't mention that bit?
-
-
So you've gone through and read all 36 opinions in that time? I can tell you, all note compliance overall. Incidents correct when arose.
-
Actually, they don't. See my
@lawfare piece explaining@OTI's major research on 702 noncompliance.https://lawfareblog.com/unintentional-noncompliance-and-need-section-702-reform … -
See my
@OTI research, based on a review of ALL declassified materials (assessments, reports, opinions, etc.), herehttps://www.newamerica.org/oti/blog/history-fisa-section-702-compliance-violations/ … -
1. Here is a better analysis, one of the world's most comprehensive breakdowns. http://tinyurl.com/y9mzddgk chapter 5 is well worth the read.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.