.@LizaGoitein identifies a loophole in Section 702’s front-end targeting procedures and proposes a solution:https://www.justsecurity.org/46239/closing-section-702s-front-door-search-loophole-critical-protection-americans/ …
-
False, self-reported by NSA. Lawfare does a fantastic breakdown of two sets of 18. http://tinyurl.com/ydcsjnuz http://tinyurl.com/y9scwnqt
So you're accusing Rosemary Collyer, the most conservative FISC judge ever, of lying. OK then.
-
-
1. As noted in Nov 2011 opinions, NSA corrected within short order, issues outlined in prior opinions. http://tinyurl.com/ydamq4fl pic.twitter.com/FvPc7pClJ0
-
Did they? Then why did they violate minimization procedures for five years? You are pretty fucking dumb for a self-described wonk.
-
If you weren't so painfully dumb I'd point out how EVEN the SSCI 702 bill refutes you.
-
1. Incorrect. The most recent opinions all note compliance. For the very fact I show even an opinion in 2011, destroys your claim.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems you'r deeply confused on what opinion you're referring to. Please, keep up and follow along.
-
Again, you accused Rosemary Collyer of lying. Period.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.