BECAUSE THE IC REFUSES TO DISCLOSE THE NUMBERS. That's why. The numbers you're citing from the report are on a TOTALLY DIFFERENT PROGRAM.https://twitter.com/NatSecWonk69/status/922858683234529280 …
-
-
Replying to @LizaGoitein
2. So, my prior questions remain for the 2011 FISC opinion. The only numbers that go into the millions is the CDRs, and that is explained.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NatSecWonk69 @LizaGoitein
Where do you get CDR claim? Plus there've been recently declassified discussions of what was included (it's post-purge)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NatSecWonk69 @LizaGoitein
Oh. You mean your comment abt Liza's number was totally whackjob off point. OK. Thanks for playing. Hey Liza! You need better trolls.
9:55 AM - 24 Oct 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.