Umm, they _got_ a warrant. As @BobbyChesney & I explained, the All Writs Act was to assist in warrant's execution:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/coherent-middle-ground-apple-fbi-all-writs-act-dispute …https://twitter.com/MiekeEoyang/status/922529227580301312 …
-
Of course. I just think the All Writs Act issue is a lot messier (and meaningfully narrower) than the warrant debate vis-a-vis 702 et al...
Sure. But want to bet within 24 hours we'll be having a debate abt whether assistance clause in 702 permits back door access?
-
-
Because we will be.
-
I would not take that bet. Because yes.
-
[Reminds self to find Apple's surging FISA numbers before their site crashes tomorrow.]
-
To be clear, that is a yes that we'll be having the debate; not a statement either way on how it's being used.
-
Who needs a statement when you have Apple's surging FISA numbers?
-
Also over the weekend I engaged in wildarse speculation that a FISA order has made it to SCOTUS. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/10/20/technical-fixes-in-hjc-bill-suggest-scotus-may-have-reviewed-a-2015-fisa-application/ …
-
If we want to speculate, who will need FISA when there's the UK's IP Act.
-
I just cant' decide whether updated to iOS 11 makes it more or less like NSA has a back door on my phone.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.