Distraction?
-
-
-
I have a feeling the CIA wont give a fuck.
-
Why would they? No-one working there now was involved.
-
There's any number of long books that can explain that to you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To some might back up his "deep state" narrative? Also, interesting that CIA headed by arguably the most Trumpian cabinet member, Pompeo.
-
It will back it.
-
Yet aren't we talking CIA from the 60s/70s pre Church Committee?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are giving him credit for understanding that it would make them squirm
-
Trump understands very little about policy and how to make govt work. He's an expert on making people squirm.
-
Yes and yes. But unless he held still long enough to know why this hurts CIA, most likely just wants credit for whatever is revealed
-
My bet is Alex Jones and Roger Stone explained it to him.
-
And a reasonable bet at that
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sheduled event since 1992. Had nothing to do with Donny.
-
Except he had the ability to push it back.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
nope, they are due to be released by law in a few days time http://2017jfk.org/countdown-to-2017/ …
-
Yes. I know. But he's being asked to delay, as always happens.
-
ah i took it as him trying to take credit
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If one of those online gambling outfits has been offering bets on Trump's next move, some conspiracy theorists just cashed in big time.
-
Another one of those "why didn't I figure out how to monetize this" moments.
-
This presidency is "The Producers" all the way down.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.