None. Except that Ahkmetshin was doing work for Fusion at the same time, which means firm was taking $$ fr Veselnitskaya.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @NatetheK
So you are defending his fabrication of the notion that Russia paid based on fact that Russia may have also been indirect client of GPS?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OllieWH22 @NatetheK
I think there are real Qs about the role of Ahkmetshin. If you think it was problematic to meet with him, then his tie to Fusion problematic
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @NatetheK
What does that have to do with whether Russia "paid for" the dossier? If firm has 2 clients, that means one paid for the other's work?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Notion that Russia paid for Fusion to produce dossier about Russia's involvement with Trump sort of nonsensical on its face. /1
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But I'd certainly consider evidence that they did. You haven't cited any other than Russia also indirectly paid Fusion for stuff.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OllieWH22 @NatetheK
You could go read one of the twenty posts I wrote on the dossier.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @NatetheK
This is my least favorite kind of journalistic tweet (don't ask questions when you could've spent hour reading my work), but okay, I will.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @OllieWH22 @NatetheK
Fine. Then perhaps START with teh question and not with the "you're wrong." Pro tip.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @OllieWH22
I didn't see a "you're wrong" just a question. Respect your work BTW, can't read everything though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I will do a post later explaining why his tweet is defensible. I'm cranky this AM sorry to be so short.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.