Whitehouse: Privilege. Let me refresh your recollection. Process for assertion. Import of exec priv so POTUS can have convos w/staff.
-
Show this thread
-
Whitehouse: Offsetting principle is that Congress has oversight over Exec branch. You conceded that that is prevailing order.
1 reply 8 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
Whitehouse: Exec priv shall not be invoked w/o specific presidential authorization. Provision for temporary request, hold abeyance.
1 reply 6 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
Whitehouse: i don't see any effort on part of Admin to ever get specific authorization for exec priv on anything, very specific Qs on SSCI.
2 replies 9 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
Whitehouse: at some point he's got to assert exec priv, you can't have abeyance forever, can you? Sessions: specific requests blahblahblah
4 replies 6 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
Sessions claims he's unaware of SCOTUS saying Congress has right to inquire abt convos. Whitehouse; other way per Reagan.
1 reply 5 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
Whitehouse; Default is you have to answer our questions, while abeyance, what I'm worried abt Admin de facto rewriting Reagan EO so no end.
2 replies 10 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Sessions: i would say we're not at that point, before assertion of exec, must know precisely. Contemptuous. Utterly contemptuous.
1 reply 9 retweets 25 likesShow this thread
Sessions: AG by talking to WHCO can agree to waive or not waive request, but really WHCO considered extension of POTUS.
-
-
Grassley now raising Holder, still wouldn't answer, then Chair Leahy didn't direct him to do so. This was prepped, btw.
2 replies 8 retweets 19 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.