Sessions says the data collected from US providers "originates abroad." By that I guess he means CA?
-
BTW here's the best article I've been able to find on the current status of 702. Good for non-lawyers like me.http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/10/13/congress-wants-to-tie-the-intelligence-communitys-hands-for-no-reason/?utm_content=buffer2f86b&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer …
Here is my response to just one badly inaccurate part of it. There are other problems with it. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/10/15/ben-wittes-and-susan-hennessey-endorse-judicial-lawbreaking/ …
-
-
If we're going to distinguish ourselves as a law-abiding nation, Congress should have authority to reinforce intent when judges ignore it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I now better understand where ur coming from. I do disagree with you, having seen how 702 works. The am. cur. argument concerns me least.
-
Right: the attack on the amicus change is wrong-headed IMO. It seems like a no-brainer, so reeks of bad faith, esp w/ad hom attacks.
-
I absolutely agree there is policy debate abt how we define FII, what protections are feasible for collected data. But we're not having that
-
Here's a post on why I think reformers and the IC are talking past each other on those more substantive issues. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/10/18/christopher-wray-and-the-myth-created-by-parallel-construction/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.