Q for @granick, others: any statue or rule preventing USG from using 702 on US A/V & security companies for files, access or data, a la KL?
Show this thread
-
-
I guess that's the thing as 'facilities' poss so generously defined (I'm learning reading
@granick). Will be factor in Kaspersky fallout -
It's a really provocative argument. They'd have to be able to tie any facilities to known (per public reporting) nation-state identifiers.
-
But I think important when we're in midst of 702 debate. USG should be clear how US compellence different from China, Russia
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Note, I suspect that USG has used 702 to go after VPNs and Tor. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/07/03/facilities-you-use-may-be-collected-under-section-702/ …
-
It seems US AVs could voluntarily share data under CISA, though. But no coercion there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.