HJC 702 bill mandate that FBI queries ping all databases would override raw 12333 sigint sharing rule against USP crime-not-FI searches, no?pic.twitter.com/u8krlaUqs9
-
Another reason I suspect they're in same place is for same reason that 215 phone dragnet queries included SPCMA: to get around FISA rules.
Adding -- exact parallel with 215/SPCMA and FISA might apply here: it might be in same federated query but access controlled by training.
-
-
That would make more sense than commingling, as it's just not in their nature to accept externally imposed rules where not necessary
-
Maybe wrong but I thnk sharing guidelines prohibit queries by agents working run-of-mill criminal cases frm pinging raw 12333 sigint content
-
Sure, but even if that's the case, it can be accomplished by tying access to training, as it is everywhere else.
-
To clarify I think even if Agent X is trained for raw 12333 sigint, if she queries a USP for routine crime case, it can't ping that database
-
because she has no articulable reason to believe that FI or CI will be obtained by her use of that USP selection term.
-
But if I'm right, this provision of Liberty Act would seem to supersede that constraint & require that database to be routinely pinged, too.
-
Not if the credentials to 702 and 12333 are different, as they would be and have been on other known exactly parallel situations.
-
& the way they did it w/215 and SPCMA is even someone trained in 215 could choose not to include that in a query so he could share results.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.