Last we discussed on this, you were annoyed with me that I wasn't listening to your answers; when I asked you for your specific rules, you
-
So your view is (1) You don't currently know how to implement the mosaic theory, but (2) If I fund you to study it, you expect you could?
No. My view is 1) you're being a disingenuous troll to 2) pretend I and others haven't thought about this and 3) I should work for free
-
-
Such an odd reaction. Not sure why I would be a troll about my career's work. But if you really think I'm disingenuous, maybe you shouldn't
-
pay any attention to what I say? I know you don't respect me; you've made that abundantly clear before. If I'm a troll & not worthy of
-
your time, maybe best to ignore me?
-
I will not have you claim, falsely, over and over, that no one has offered options. I and others have. You don't like how we've answered.
-
Let me try again. Several people have said that there are various factors they would look at in coming up with answers. But none have
-
actually answered my set of questions. It's totally fine if you want to say that it's irrelevant that my specific Qs haven't been answered.
-
If you want YOUR SPECIFIC QUESTIONS answered, provide the forum. But ... you don't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not a law professor. I'm not an NGO table-sitter. I am, at this point, pretty expert. But I can't and won't work on demand for free.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.