Thus the most incriminating, misogynistic scandal in presidential campaign history was overwhelmed by the most irrelevant one.https://twitter.com/lolgop/status/916747499058147328 …
-
Neither. Access Hollywood totally dominated, but just for days. Podesta mattered bc it was sustained over time, not bc of immediate impact.
In fact, I would argue that Assange fucked up bc by competing w/Access Hollywood, speech experts didn't get any focus.
-
-
I think there are other questions worth asking: how much each campaign/WL knew about what the other (and IC) had coming.
-
But as someone noted earlier, it is silly to be surprised that both sides released dirt before debate.
-
What's surprising is that one of the "sides" that released dirt before the debate was, you know, a long-time adversarial foreign country.
-
Assange's Ecuadorian closet is a long-time adversary?
-
Russians steal emails. Russians give emails to Assange. Assange publishes emails. Yeah, that sounds like an Ecuadorian closet to me.
-
See my follow-up post. And RU did not republish them a zillion times in the most credible outlets.
-
Also - politics is a blood sport that determines life and death, and any avenue of attack on Trump is a good one. Rs wouldn't hesitate!
-
Which is why they didn't hesitate to claim plausible deniability about the stolen emails to make the most of them.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.