1) Under 702 precedent, it's unclear whether the most intrusive US person collection is "incidental" or "intentional"
-
-
Show this thread
-
2) An "ordinary course of business" count at NSA will miss where most interaction with US person data occurs in ordinary course of business
Show this thread -
3) If DNI won't be asked for a real count, don't permit him to say a count is impossible
Show this thread -
4) The obsession with unmasking represents an elite person's focus on impact
Show this thread -
5) Tracking disseminations that don't happen Why oh why does Congress let FBI walk all over them on transparency/metrics?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.