that would mainly be the stuff about "leadership intentions" coming from supposed kremlin insiders, right? essentially unverifiable...
-
-
Replying to @empiricalerror @emptywheel and
... unless the ic has corresponding intercepts. we don't know. plus, there is a lot of stuff that steele reported that did _not_ pan out.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror @emptywheel and
and lots and lots of things that did happen (but were not publicly known at the time) but are oddly absent from the dossier.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @empiricalerror @emptywheel and
things highly-placed inside sources as those steele claims should have known / been aware of.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Which is why at this point I'm far far far more interesting in the disinfo of the dossier.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
yep, agreed.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gregmaturin28 @empiricalerror and
It's intel. Hard to collect if effectively if a bunch of journalists are trying to confirm it.
7:35 PM - 5 Oct 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.